Date: 21 Oct 1998 22:00:51 GMT From: "Steve Phillips" <solicenopsamdnet.att.net> Subject: Re: Horsepower or Torque? Which is more significant?
You seem to think saabs and jaquars are nice cars? hahaha, its so hard to keep a jag on the road its pathetic. And saabs are just ugly pieces of junk too. Gimmie a Saleen Mustang over any jag any (excluding the XJ220) and I wouldnt even consider a saab for performance, there junk. Safety? hahahaha. r600nopsamejanews.com wrote in message <70kueq$vuf$1nopsam1.dejanews.com>... >In article <3610F0ED.3926CCF3nopsamoNOSPAM.net>, > Garry <eurasianopsamoNOSPAM.net> wrote: >> daver wrote: >> >> > dsa44nopsamnet (Douglas S. Arnson) wrote: >> > >> > >I am soon to part with my 92 nissan maxima se with 3.0 v6 and 190 hp >> > >and 202 ft/lb (I think) torque. >> > > >> > >I am considering the saab 9-5 with 178 hp v4 turbo with 207 torque at >> > >1800 rpm. (The v6 turbo is almost $3000 more!!) >> >> After Maxima you should look up to the Bimmer, but not down to the SAAB. >> Just a another Ford, nothing special. >> >> -- >> Garry, '95 MaxSE > >Hey Garry, check your data -- Saab has no relationship with Ford, but Jaguar >does. I guess in your book that makes Jaguar nothing special -- what I would >expect from an uneducated Nissan driver. Look around this post and you'll see >people who are passionate about a brand that delivers on performance and >safety -- good luck surviving an accident in your Maxima, or should I say >Minima? > >> >> *************************************************** >> * To contact remove NOSPAM from e-mail address * >> *************************************************** >> >> > >-----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==---------- >http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
