Date: 17 Feb 1999 08:40:05 -0500
From: lparkernopsamy.edu (Lloyd R. Parker)
Subject: Re: SAAB 9-5 or Charysler 300M ?


r600nopsamejanews.com wrote: : Lloyd, my message below was in response to another message about Saab, not : about this ongoing 300M vs 9-5 comparison... : : But as usual, you've added a bunch of bone-head comments. The magazine's are : full of shit. Car and Driver ranks the S70 above the 9-5. Then last month, : C&D's sister publication, R&T, ranks the 9-3 above the S70 (which came in last : out of six), the MB C280, etc... The 9-5 is a better car than the 9-3, period. : So, what gives? It's all personal choice. You prefer the styling and value of : the 300M, I prefer the individuality and innovation of Saab. Doesn't R&T do two rankings -- one independent of price and one dependent on it? Have you read the Consumer Reports tests? They like the 9-5 quite a bit, but do not like the 9-3 at all.

Return to Main Index

The content on this site may not be republished without permission. Copyright © 1988-2019 - The Saab Network - saabnet.com.
For usage guidelines, see the Saabnet.com Mission and Purpose Page.
[Contact | Site Map | Saabnet.com on Facebook | Saabnet.com on Twitter | Shop Amazon via TSN | Site Donations]