Date: 16 Feb 1999 19:19:15 GMT From: fenechnopsamO".com Subject: Re: SAAB 9-5 or Charysler 300M ?
I agree, the 300M, as far as I'm concerned, was doomed from the beginning as far as its styling becoming old, since it was preceeded by several similar styled Chrysler/Dodge models in the Mid-1990's. ie. Cirrus, Concorde, LHS, Intrepid, Sebring etc....don't get me wrong though, I think it's a classy/sporty vehicle and there is a significant market out there for them. I just wouldn't replace my 9-5 with one! In <7ac96o$ff0$1nopsamurst.ccs.yorku.ca>, morrnopsamu.caS* (Mark Orr) writes: >In its heyday Chryser was a prestigeous nameplate, but, after two decades of >crap, they are just starting to rebuild their reputation. Saab is quite a >prestigeous, if somewhat oddball name. I have never been criticized by anyone >about my decision to buy a Saab, and anyone who has been in the car has been >impressed by it....so far. Maybe its just a persoanl view that bears no merit, >but I don't think so. > >Mark > Later, Pablo Replace "IGMO" with us.ibm fenechnopsambm.com
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
