Date: Wed, 21 Jul 1999 15:23:07 GMT
From: kr4nopsamnyu.edu (Kalman Rubinson)
Subject: Re: Saab and GM


Chris Thurrott (dontsendnopsamspam.tome) wrote: > 4. This one is just my opinion, but I agree that the 1994 900 probably > wasn't quite ready. I think they probably *started* planning the 9-3 as > soon as it was introduced, giving them 5 years to refine the 900 and from > what I've seen and read (and driven in) they've done quite a good job. Even > the 900's after '94 and '95 were really pretty good - I've had no problems > with my '96 900 S I had no problems with my '96 900SET (other than that inflicted by pot-holes) but, despite a similar appearance, my '99 9-3SE drives and feels vastly superior. GM's fault? Mebbe. Kal

Return to Main Index

The content on this site may not be republished without permission. Copyright © 1988-2017 - The Saab Network - saabnet.com.
For usage guidelines, see the Saabnet.com Mission and Purpose Page.
[Contact | Site Map | Saabnet.com on Facebook | Saabnet.com on Twitter | Shop Amazon via TSN | Site Donations]