Date: Tue, 31 Aug 1999 22:19:08 -0400 From: "Eric R. Sterbenz" <ericnopsamth.com> Subject: Re: Advice: 95 or 99 Convertible?
Ottoa, The '95 (and I'm not sure how much later) had a very poor design with the electric top motors (I had to have mine replaced at 30K). So bad in fact that SAAB replaced it with a hydralic mechanism in the newer models. Just something to be aware of. ottoa wrote: > I am trying to figure out which of the following two cars > are a better value for me. The first is a '95 900s > convertible w/60Kmi for $16K, the other is a '99 9-3 > convertible w/15Kmi for $34k. As this car will basically be > a fun weekend car it seems silly to spend $34K for a car > that sits in a garage most of the time, however I am > concerned about the milage on the '95. Anybody have any > suggestions? Thanks. > > * Sent from RemarQ http://www.remarq.com The Internet's Discussion Network * > The fastest and easiest way to search and participate in Usenet - Free! Hope this helps, -- E.R. Sterbenz ericnopsamth.com
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
