Date: Mon, 30 Aug 1999 23:11:12 GMT From: davenucnopsamail.com Subject: Re: Advice: 95 or 99 Convertible?
I also have a 95 900SE Conv and with 40,000 mi it runs great. I really like the car. I wouldn't mind a new one, but not if you're not going to use it every day. Dave "Dave Runyon" <drunyon1nopsamp.rr.com> wrote: > I would not be afraid of the '95. > I own a 1995 SE convertible with 48K and it is like new. > If the car is well maintained, these are designed to last. > Its all about your budget at the end of the day, though. > > ottoa <aottavioNOdySPAMnopsammbus.rr.com> wrote in message > news:000b8d9b.0bc14bc9nopsamex0102-011.remarq.com... > > I am trying to figure out which of the following two cars > > are a better value for me. The first is a '95 900s > > convertible w/60Kmi for $16K, the other is a '99 9-3 > > convertible w/15Kmi for $34k. As this car will basically be > > a fun weekend car it seems silly to spend $34K for a car > > that sits in a garage most of the time, however I am > > concerned about the milage on the '95. Anybody have any > > suggestions? Thanks. > > > > * Sent from RemarQ http://www.remarq.com The Internet's Discussion Network > * > > The fastest and easiest way to search and participate in Usenet - Free! > > > > Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/ Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
