Date: Tue, 9 Nov 1999 19:25:37 -0800 From: "John R. Weiss" <jrweissnopsamet*nospam*.com> Subject: Re: '94 vs. '97 900SE
How were the 2 SEs equipped -- identically? I had a '94 SE V-6 5-door, and traded it in for a '98 S Turbo coupe. I liked the low-end torque of the V-6 better, and the 4 doors and opening rear quarter windows were advantageous at times, but I still like the '98 better: No timing belt concerns with the 4-cyl turbo. Better engine response at highway speeds without downshifting. Hydraulic clutch works better than the cable-operated clutch. ----------------- John Weiss Seattle, WA remove *nospam* from e-mail address for reply BarryG <bgNOSPAMnopsamny.net> wrote in message news:807m7h$9be$1nopsam.monmouth.com... > I readily admit to a lack of knowledge in the evolution of the 900SE over > the last six years. That being said, I visited the local dealer Saturday > with the half-baked idea of trading in my '94 900SE with 99K miles toward a > low mileage '97 900SE. I took the '97 for quite a test drive and couldn't > believe that this was the same car, at least in name. It looked the same, > but this was a mere ghost of the driver's car my '94 is. This is certainly > my bias and top priority - the sheer excitement of driving, which my '94 has > delivered in spades for every day of the two years I've owned it. In terms > of steering, throttle and braking response there was no comparison. I > realize now that I wouldn't have taken the '97 as an even trade for my '94. > Funny, because my original goal was to pay about $10K plus my '94.
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
