Date: Mon, 27 Dec 1999 20:18:38 -0500 From: Four Weis <mweinopsamcom> Subject: Re: Saab is Anti-Hunting and Anti-Gun
In Fairfax County they solved the deer population without using any hunting license fees. Over half of the deer population were killed by a virus. We have been ASSURED that this virus will not harm humans. Now I know what they did with all that old stuff in Fort Detrick. TimeRangernopsam.com wrote: > On Mon, 27 Dec 1999 18:35:40 GMT, jim.robbinsnopsam.com > (jim.robbinsnopsam.com) wrote: > > > > >You don't think that Saab knows that a gun rack for its cars would be an > >under-appreciated accessory? They know the demographics of their > >customers better than you know yourself, make no mistake about that. They > >figure that the hunters are going to stick with the pickup trucks anyway. > >The hood of a Saab is simply inadequate for lashing down the carcass of a > >dead animal anyway. > > > >And by the way, without the political pressure of hunters, local > >governments would be free to use the equally effective and far more humane > >tactic of seeding deer-infested areas with contraceptive baits and > >adopting better land management strategies. > > And without the fees generated by hunting licenses, the governments > would get the funds for this "seeding" from where? They don't even > have the funds to eradicate grasshoppers. > >In article <1JFkONMKcw11JKIuUAnzvIFMLHY2nopsamcom>, TimeRangernopsam.com wrote: > >> Because the deer > >> population would EXPLODE without the annual harvest taken every year > >> by hunters. Without hunting, Millions of deer would starve to death > >> every winter - This is better than being hunted?? > >> Sorry, > >> but Saab sucks the big one on this issue. Supporting the urban animal > >> shelters is one thing, but being anti-hunting is another. > >> > > -- > When a person delegates their responsibilities to another, that person loses the right to complain about the misuse of those responsibilities.
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
