Date: Mon, 08 May 2000 20:15:54 GMT From: Kalman Rubinson <kr4nopsamnyu.edu> Subject: Re: 900 vs 9000
Kevin Lee <krlnopsamia4.co.uk> wrote: > Just out of Interest in the latest UK JD Power survey for our "R" > (98) registered cars the 9-3 came lower in the polls than the 900 by > one point . Is that 1 point statistically significant? I think that the results might be different if the poll were conducted only among drivers who have owned/driven both cars. > The 9-3 was marked down for poor fuel perfomance and > electrical problems for which the 900 did better !. The fuel performance drop is something I have noted but, since my 1996 NG900 had major electrical/MPU failures (repaired under warranty) and my 1999 9-3 has had none (to date), I cannot concur on the latter issue. Kal
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
