Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2000 19:05:23 +0100 From: J <johsnopsamsafish.com> Subject: Re: 900=9-3, why isn't 9000=9-4?
Arild Eik wrote: > > You have to go back in time. Back to the Saab 95 (introduced in 1959) which > was the first Saab station wagon and "the big brother" compared to Saab 93 > (introduced in 1955): > > Saab 93 => 900 => 9-3 > > Saab 95 => 9000 => 9-5. > > Arild > > "Bobcat" <onopsamgt; wrote in message > news:_eEn5.1126$TX2.49231nopsam.direcpc.com... > > If the 900 became the 9-3, how come the > > 9000 didn't become the 9-4 but ended up 9-5? > > > > Just wondering.... > > > > Hm! not very logical. 1) The 9-5 comes in both saloon and station wagon. 2) The first 9000 was slightly shorter than the old 900 and was meant to be a "modern" replacement for the 900. However, interest in the 900 remained strong. 3) No, I don't watch "Big brother" ... Johannes
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
