Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2001 21:45:25 GMT From: "ECHJR" <edwardnopsamam-unicity.net> Subject: Re: Saab's Suck in Comparison To Competition
The funny thing about a guy like yourself "Bob" is that you could have very well ignored my post, but my machination was just to much for you to ignore. So next time someone comes in and "Trolls" your threads why don't you just push on.. ignore these "trolls" threads? Watch us cease when we receive no reaction. And if you are going to argue the purpose and reasoning of my posts, I ask you to question your purposeless replies to those posts that perpetuate the conflicts. Albeit mine or any other post that is not of a "negative" connotation or disrupts a part of you that you don't like. Don't get all pissy at me Bob just because your steep depreciation GM/Saab continues to jostle your pocket book with all of its quirky problems and expensive parts... That was your decision.. I continue to feed your anger and I enjoy it so I await your further response... No, I dare you.. Nothing Better To Do, Ed "Bob" <uctraingnopsamanet.com> wrote in message news:p2ufat86abns3ncmh3a299toefguj4cvn8nopsamcom... > On Wed, 07 Mar 2001 22:51:40 GMT, "ECHJR" <edwardnopsamam-unicity.net> > wrote: > > >Troll-O-Meter? > >Interesting Bob... > >Is that some sort of scientifc measurement of how annoyed YOU > >are with someone stating clear and obvious distinctions THEY observed in a > >test drive? > >Just because I dont fell like driving some masked GM/Opel Vectra (A $40K > >Opel) doesnt make > >me a Troll. > > What makes you a TROLL is the fact that you posted into > a Saab newsgroup with a "Saabs Suck" title and a post > which negatively reflects on Saabs. Then you proceed > to tell us about the wonderful Chrysler that you bought. > > So, what exactly was the point of your post? To start an > intelligent comparison of Saab's vs. Chryslers ? No, my good > friend, we all know the point was to TROLL. > > Get lost. We won't miss you. > Bob >
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
