Date: 9 Sep 2001 02:54:14 -0700 From: johsnopsamanytime.co.uk (Johannes H Andersen) Subject: Re: higher maintenance costs for Saab 9-3 (convertible) than Volvo ?
"General Tsou" <shamusnopsam30.net> wrote in message news:<21Dm7.1831$hH4.1184887nopsamalto-snr1.gtei.net>... > I will give you my opinion on this. I would choose the Volvo C70 over the > Saab in a heartbeat. > Much better looking car, and I would expect the reliability and maintenance > costs of the Volvo > to be at least as good as the Saab, and probably better. I would also > seriously consider the > new BMW 3-series convertible as an option as well. I love that car, but > the C70 looks give it > a good run for my money! Ha, if looks were the only criterium, then the Volvo is out of the question. There was recently a BBC motoring program testing precisely those three cars. A crowd of bystanders was then asked to choose, they had no hesitation choosing the Saab convertible for looks. The Volvo was the least popular because they couldn't get the Volvo estates out of their mind. The Beamer was also good, but expensive and too common. Johannes
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
