Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2001 01:53:04 GMT From: BobR <BobRosnopsamdnet.att.net> Subject: Re: Mixed Saab Results...
Just Bob wrote: > > On Tue, 25 Sep 2001 21:39:20 GMT, C Rode <crodenopsamdnet.att.net> > wrote: > > >You mean I paid for a Saab and got a Lumina? Bugger! > > > >BobR wrote: > > > >> The GM 900 Saabs look, feel and drive like junk - they are 900 > >> "replicas", knock-offs - even though the company that currently passes > >> for Saab made them. > > You forgot to add, "IMHO". > > I have a 97 NG900 that's a terrific car. I've had a couple of items > fail but they were all already on TSP's so finding the problem was > hardly a challenge. > > I still can't believe you 'classic' guys who think that a 10 year old > car is going to be less trouble than a 3 year old car. To each his > own. > > Bob There's no doubt that on average a 3 yr old car would have less maintenance than a 10 yr old one. So what? - we're talking about cars that we like, versus cars we don't like. But you'll get your chance - those who've seen the new models are already calling the NG900s "classics".<g>.
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
