Date: 3 Jan 2002 14:48:22 -0800 From: johsnopsamanytime.co.uk (Johannes H Andersen) Subject: Re: ADVICE ON CHOOSING FIRST SAAB CONVO (UK)
aero2lnopsamail.com wrote in message news:<aero2l-0101022350410001nopsam1-175.easynet.co.uk>... > Due to RTA need to replace my car(in UK). > > Like I suspect many Saab owners, I am attracted by the car's image, in > this case the 9-3 185 cabrio. > > But I am deterred by consistently negative write-ups about the car's > humble GM chassis being 'unable' to adequately handle the power, its > excessive shakes (unlike the rigid BMW which is unfailingly praised). Is > this mutton dressed up as lamb? > Possibly, but almost any cabrio is somewhat compromised, also BMW. That's a choice you make. The motoring journos are often crazy boy racers who powerslide the test cars on old airfields; unrealistic for everyday motoring. Completely New 9-3 in September 2002 are said to handle better, new cabrios may have to wait. > Also, are the turbo units reliable to last unchanged for say 100k? > > Any other mechanical failings? The turbos are fine. These engines are really the best part of the package; smooth and powerful at low RPM. Aircraft style dash & best seats in business is another Saab speciality. Johannes
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
