Date: 16 May 2002 18:38:22 GMT From: davehinznopsamcop.net Subject: Re: 2002/1 9-3 versus loaner 2000 9-5
Someone who looks an awful lot like hamish aggis <ecossenopsamo.net> wrote: > i had a 9-5 for 3 years on lease until last summer - the choice was then > another 9-5 or 9-3 > went for the 9-3 as i had less requirement for rear space (3 kids - 2 off > to university) but load space - especially for large objects, so the > decision was primarily rear seat v hatch. (snip) I think if there's one consistant message from all the replies, it's that you won't be unhappy either way. Dave