Date: Thu, 16 May 2002 13:18:52 GMT
From: jim andrews <jimandrewsnopsamintexas.com>
Subject: Re: 2002/1 9-3 versus loaner 2000 9-5


In article <ac09vs$m19bc$3nopsam34476.news.dfncis.de>, davehinznopsamcop.net says... > Someone who looks an awful lot like jim andrews <jimandrewsnopsamintexas.com> wrote: > > At similar pricing, does anybody have any thoughts on the general > > pros and cons of a 2002 or 2001 9-3 as compared to a 2000 9-5 > > loaner with 7k miles? I like the *look* of the 9-5 better (it's > > the 4-door sedan) compared to the 9-3 hatchbacks, but even then > > it's a close call. For what it's worth, I've never owned nor > > even driven a Saab . . . and yes, I'll drive before buying! > > Hi, Jim. I have a '99 9-5, and when it was in for it's 30,000 mile > checkup, was loaned a 2001 9-3. I found the 9-3 to be quicker (185HP > vs 170HP, and the 9-3 is lighter also), but the ride was considerably > less comfortable over less-than-perfect roads. > > When I bought, the biggest deciding factor was, to be honest, rear seat > legroom. I knew it'd be a Saab, I knew it'd be a '99 (3 year lease > return), but other than that I was wide open. After I borrowed the loaner > 9-3 for a day, I'm glad that I got the 9-5. The 9-3 isn't a bad car by > any means at all, but depending on what's more important to you, well, it > depends. > > What are you expecting from the car? Thanks for the quick reply, Dave . . . Right now I drive a 2001 Honda S2000. I love the car, but we have a baby due in August, and practicality is rearing its ugly head. A back seat is required, and four doors would be nice. I'll also be making a longer commute to work in about a year, so I'd like a car that is more comfortable in daily traffic than the hard-as-a-rock S2000. However, I'd like at least *some* hint of that car's awesome performance. (I'm not considering the 9-3 convertible, though. I put the top down on the S2000 all the time, but road noise is a real issue even when it's up. If I'm gonna buy a car that purports to be in the "near-luxury" class, I just don't want that noise.) So, there's not a whole lot of things I have listed above that really differentiate between the 9-5 and the 9-3, are there? I like the idea of the 9-3 quickness and utility, and I like the 9-5 looks. (I think the 9-3 looks great, too, so who knows?) Is the price on the 9-5 (just under $25K) out of line for a loaner with 7k miles? I must admit I like the balloon payment option here in Texas on a 9-3, which starts at $299/month for the base model. I tend to swap cars fairly often, and need to come to terms with that (ridiculous) compulsion! jim andrews

Return to Main Index

The content on this site may not be republished without permission. Copyright © 1988-2019 - The Saab Network - saabnet.com.
For usage guidelines, see the Saabnet.com Mission and Purpose Page.
[Contact | Site Map | Saabnet.com on Facebook | Saabnet.com on Twitter | Shop Amazon via TSN | Site Donations]