Date: Sat, 17 Aug 2002 20:49:58 GMT From: hohnopsamlid.invalid (Goran Larsson) Subject: Re: 2.3 or V-6 for 9-5 Wagon
In article <Kjx79.162871$f05.9116822nopsam1.calgary.shaw.ca>, R.H. <r.hammelnopsam.ca> wrote: > ....never, ever said the V6 was superior. But..... It gets good mileage, has > smooth, fluid power, excellent low end grunt, no annoying turbo whine, (yup The turbo in the 2.3 does not whine more than the turbo in the V6. > Longevity? doesn't a lower revving engine usually outlast a higher revving > one. Don't normally aspirated engines outlast forced induction engines? Lower revving? Normally aspirated? Do you know what kind of V6 engine Saab use in the 9-5? -- G–ran Larsson http://www.nospam.com