Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2002 09:51:58 -0400
From: KeithG <noonenopsamspring.com>
Subject: Re: My hopes for the new 9-3


Agreed. I hope they 'get it right'. If not, they will die a painful death to become a supplier of small engines for GM. Not just fit and finish issues (the new 9^3 looked nice at the SOC), but 1) we could not drive it (proof in the pudding) 2) no hatch. I really feel that the 9k was a squandered opportunity. It was/is too complex for most people and service organizations to handle. It was probably the nicest car with potential mass appeal that nobody ever heard about. My 'new to me' '95 9kCS 5sp continues to impress me. A lot of Saab nuts would like something more like the c900, but this would not play too well in the current market. KeithG Lee Marshall wrote: > As some of you may be aware from reading my posts elsewhere in this group, I > am the (mostly) proud owner of a '97 9000 Aero. Due to some ongoing problems > with my car, I have been fortunate to have been able to test most of the > current Saab range as courtesy cars. Although to be honest, I have not been > too impressed. > > I have found that the build quality across the whole range has been totally > sub-standard for the market in which Saabs compete, especially compared to > my 9k. > > The current 9-3 has typically great engines, apart from the awful 2.2 Turbo > Diesel. This is without doubt the worst diesel car I have ever driven (maybe > excluding a Peugeot 106 1.5D), although the engine was quite powerful the > noise and vibration (particulary through the clutch pedal) was unacceptable. > The 2.0 LPT is the best engine in the range, the full blown turbo being too > powerful for the chassis. The sound system on the coupe was exceptional > though. > > My current courtesy car is a brand new 9-5 Linear 2.0 LPT, but this too has > many faults. Again the build quality is poor (particularly the lid on the > cubby hole between the front seats). There is also a general lack of storage > space, the door pockets are far too small and there is only one cupholder, > albeit a very nice one. However the main problem with the 9-5 is again the > chassis. Even with the base 150bhp engine, you can lose traction pulling out > of junctions and going around roundabouts. I admit my 9000 doesn't have > wonderful traction but it is better than 9-5, even with 75bhp more. I have > also found the 9-5 to be "loose" and prone to lift-off oversteer, not nice > in a car this big. > > I have high hopes for the 9-3, although being based on the new Vectra > (Epsilon) platform isn't going to help (if past experience is anything to go > by). If Saab can improve the build quality and find a way of taming 200+bhp > I sure it will sell well. My other immediate concern for the new 9-3 is a > lack of what Saabs usually have, excess power. The new 9-3 is going to be a > heavy car and I think the new Aero will not have the power to compete with > it's main competitor, the BMW 330. It seems to me that Volvo is taking the > lead in the Swedish power stakes, and that can only be bad for Saab. > > Sorry if I have droned on too much about this, but this has been burning > away inside for some time. > > I welcome your counter-comments! > > Lee > > > --- > Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. > Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). > Version: 6.0.384 / Virus Database: 216 - Release Date: 21/08/2002 > >

Return to Main Index

The content on this site may not be republished without permission. Copyright © 1988-2019 - The Saab Network - saabnet.com.
For usage guidelines, see the Saabnet.com Mission and Purpose Page.
[Contact | Site Map | Saabnet.com on Facebook | Saabnet.com on Twitter | Shop Amazon via TSN | Site Donations]