Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2002 21:36:30 GMT From: "James Eckles" <dcjayhawknopsamhlink.net> Subject: Re: Site going down.
Again, I agree completely. It's Dave's "know it all" rude attitude that makes people not want to post here for fear of being jumped all over by a guy who acts like he owns the place! "Davo" <whatevernopsamever.com> wrote in message news:Apih9.11159$Ee4.31582nopsam-server.bigpond.net.au... > > <davehinznopsamcop.net> wrote in message > news:am3a17$2bmj5$1nopsam34476.news.dfncis.de... > > Someone who looks an awful lot like Davo <whatevernopsamever.com> wrote: > > > > > Colin, don't let Dave Hinz get under your skin. If there's even an iota > of a > > > point that can be picked on, he's in there boots and all dissecting > every > > > last piece. > > > > So, are you defending the publishing of private email then? > > No. Who said I was defending it? The particular occurrence in question has > been debated in good spirit amongst the other posters. That one is up for > debate. > > > > > There are more posts from Dave engaging in fights with posters > > > (not everyone is as *usenet* wise as Dave), than constructive > contributions > > > directly relating to SAABs. > > > > Yeah, I hardly ever try to help, or discuss the models I know about, or > > engage in Saab discussions here. Riiiiight... > > Note the use of my word 'more'. > > > Let's see. I dislike spammers, people who try to cheat their way through > > life, and people who go against usenet conventions (like, don't post a > > binary to a text newsgroup). Which of these actions are you defending, > > and on what grounds exactly? > > Your infer that I defend 'spamming' and 'those who cheat their way through > life'? Retract please! > CN was hardly spamming. http://spam.abuse.net/overview/whatisspam.shtml > Usenet conventions aren't known by all. Politeness as I've seen from others > resolve the issues fairly quickly. > > > > You will not be forgiven.. as I won't for this > > > post... but hey, who gives a toss. > > > > Actually, I haven't noticed you much either way. But, I would like you to > > explain which of the above types of people you're defending, so I at least > > know why you disagree. > > As above > > > > You're providing a service out of your > > > own good will and that's where it should be left. > > > > And I said twice, put it up, and if people like it, they'll use it. Maybe > > you missed that (twice)? He broke the rules on someone else's forum, not > > once but twice, by ignoring a warning that's right in front of one's > > face when they're using the site. It's not rocket science... > > No, I didn't miss that twice. It's your ridiculously rude attitude here that > turns others off. It's not rocket science.... > > > > > >
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
