Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2002 15:37:07 GMT From: Louis Cornelio <cornelionopsamrr.com> Subject: Re: SAAB & dealers - who is responsible?
In article <3da6db26$0$1432$272ea4a1nopsam.execpc.com>, "Walt Kienzle" <wkienzlenopsam.com> wrote: > Can't you just say that you have the stamp for 35,000, so the belt must > have > been changed? Why assume that the required work wasn't done (even though > it > might not have been) The mechanic at the shop where it is now says it does not appear to be new >when you have documentation that leads you to be > able > to claim that the belt failed after 16k miles? > If the defunct dealer is > as > underhanded as you are suggesting, they should have even filed a warranty > claim for payment from Saab for this work, so there should be additional > documentation to "substantiate" that the work was done. Just a thought. They did NOT file for the warranty work ( according to SAAB) - I must assume because the didnt do it. So SAAB will do nothing - it isn't their error they say. And the dealer has no incentive to take the $$$ repair - they cant be touched for it by SAAB so I can only take them to small claims court. grrrrr