Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2003 21:46:17 -0000 From: MeatballTurbo <carl.robsonnopsamcing-czechs.com> Subject: Re: What to call the "new" 9-3 ?
In article <3E7A07B3.54FD1615nopsam.com>, Somewherenopsam.com spouted forth into alt.autos.saab... > > "'nuther Bob" <noemailnopsammain.com> wrote in message > > news:bbej7vcf2m5tvep1sei1dcdon056img81dnopsamcom... > > > It's needs a nickname fast or we're going to get confused. > > > > > > OG900 or classic 900 and NG900 all worked well. 9-3 was fine. > > > But, now we have a new 9-3 and an old 9-3. I think "NG 9-3" is out > > > since the end of the NG900 run was essentially the 9-3 and it will > > > be confusing. > > > > > > Suggestions ? > > > > > > Bob > > How about "Saturn"... > how about Satan. Equally blasphemous? -- Carl Robson (The poster formerly known as Skodapilot) http://www.bouncing-czechs.com
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
