Date: Tue, 02 Dec 2003 21:37:24 +0100 From: Robert Brown <roxbert.brxownnopsampnet.se> Subject: Re: Some More Pics
Robert Brown wrote: -----8<----cutting previous > > > Hard to understand his (and Adrian's) subsequent comments that some of us > respondents are missing the distinction between negative lift forces and drag. > We have answered according to the symptoms described. > > When you have worked out what problem you really want to describe on this NG, > then I am sure you will get responses that you will find relevant and > hopefully useful. > Oops - apologies to Adrian and Matt for the final 2 paragraphs here. In fact no one has actually said that drag is the primary issue. My fault. Guess I better get back on them pills them thar voices makin me do it ;-) But seriously folks - the air dam can be shaped to push air as much to the sides as upwards, which would result in minimal added downforce, yet counter the menacing lift issue. Laura's still right on the money IMO, if you use the right shape on the air dam. Extending the current dam downwards 3-4 cm should reduce air under the car without increasing the front axle load. Just build it strong . . . /Robert
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
