Date: Mon, 01 Dec 2003 09:32:53 GMT From: "Mark Plumlee" <turbospgnopsamsouth.net> Subject: Re: 9000 or 9-5?
if you get a 9-5, get a 2002 aero, best overall for the $$$ Mark 2002 aero 1995 9000cs 1991 900 CV T 1991 SPG 77 99 ems "jasonoc" <koolcatnopsamvethiskoolcats.co.uk> wrote in message news:bq61h5$m8h$1nopsamules.btinternet.com... > nexttime ill think b4 i reply. Oviously you going for maptune stage 3 > sorry tis late and i had alonnng day > > "jasonoc" <koolcatnopsamvethiskoolcats.co.uk> wrote in message > news:bq61bg$gle$1nopsamta.btinternet.com... > > murph isnt that a bit costly? wouldnt it be better just to goto stage 3? > > wats so differnet bout the road map? > > > > > > Jay > > > > "Murphwiz" <murphwiznopsamail.com/NOSPAMTHANKS/> wrote in message > > news:nCuxb.640$SN1.685463nopsamfep1-win.server.ntli.net... > > > > > > "jasonoc" <koolcatnopsamvethiskoolcats.co.uk> wrote in message > > > news:bq5qlu$1qq$1nopsamules.btinternet.com... > > > > unless you chip it murph ;) > > > > i got the ppc from simon at www.t.com whicked upgrade the > > car > > > > really pulls hard now (2.3lpt 9-5 stage1 ppc) added 69bhp! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I've got the Speedparts (BSR) stage 2 thanks ;-) got mine From > > > www.elkparts.com although I'm about to replace it with the maptun > upgrade! > > > www.maptun.co.uk > > > > > > -- > > > Why not give the forums a try?! > > > > > > www.m > > > www.t.com > > > > > > > > > > > >
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
