Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2004 16:13:53 GMT From: "J. Harris" <jackharrisnopsamct-o-cutor.comdamnspam> Subject: Re: opinion on 99 9-3
Been driving a 2001 9-3SE for about two years now. Only grievances include a soft suspension (though that can be "fixed/modified"), torque steer took a few days to appreciate, the A-pillars seem really big/fat (though they are that way in most cars today), the rear seats don't fold flat, and the stock front-door speakers can't handle moderate levels of bass at high volume. Overall build quality is fine compared to other entry-level lux. mobiles (good panel matches [no gaps]). And maintenance has been a breeze (no need for any warranty work [though I am keeping an eye on the SID]). All things considered, I'm happy with the car. -- J.Harris '01 9-3SE '97 900SE '88 9000T (R.I.P.) "mil0" <mil0nopsamramail-nospam.com> wrote in message news:0xdYb.19203$Ff2.13759nopsamps12... > I am looking at a 1999 9-3 and was wondering what some others felt about > this car. Anyone have any personal advice about these cars -- good, bad, or > otherwise?
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
