Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2004 11:40:53 GMT From: psychonospam.there Subject: Re: Message To America's Students: The War, The Draft, Your Future
Forgery or not, a vote for Nader IS a vote for Bush. The Nadewr campaign is a waste and will do nothing but sway votes from legitimate candidates. As you can probably guess, I will not be voting for Bush. My options may be limited and may not be any better, but I'll not vote for Bush under the Nader guise either. As to thew original post, we HAVE been down this road before. In 2000 when the Nader vote helped Bush steal the last election. I can't say that Gore would have been any better, our entire govermental system is pretty corrupt, but we all knew where Bush stood on too many issues. Make your votes count people. Whether you support Bush's re-election or not, use your vote to select a candidate that actually stands a chance. Don't waste it supporting someone who will never become mainstream enough to get the job done. On Mon, 12 Apr 2004 23:09:22 +0100, "TMack" <REMOVETHECAPStonymackinnospamoot.com> wrote: > >"Michael Culley" <mikenospamam.com> wrote in message >news:407a7490$0$20662$afc38c87nospam.optusnet.com.au... >> "TMack" <REMOVETHECAPStonymackinnospamoot.com> wrote in message >> news:c5dio7$e8l0$1nospam7499.news.uni-berlin.de... >> > This message is a forgery. See >> > >> > http://www.votenader.org/contact/spam.php >> >> Personally I think it isn't, they are pretending it is as a way to send >> spam. Most likely you are part of their organisation. If someone from >their >> organisation was going to post a message what you posted is exactly what >it >> would say. > >Michael Culley > >On the other hand, you could belong to the conspiracy to fraudulently send >this kind of spam. Your clever double-bluff could easily be part of the >strategy - seeking to discredit anyone who exposes the forgery. Your reply >is exactly what one of the forgers would say. > >Tony >
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
