Date: Mon, 17 May 2004 23:42:39 -0400 From: Hans Lellelid <hplnospam> Subject: Re: ... The Lexus of Subaru's" ... ?!?
Kristian Steve Jensen wrote: > > >>So, I'm saying that while I realize that it >>serves a function, I think the car could have been designed in a way >>that didn't necessistate that hole in the hood. I mean -- look at the >>Volvo S60R putting out 300hp with a high-pressure turbo ... no scoop. >>The S4 twin turbo ... no scoop. I don't think it's required :) > > > Since the Saab is built on the Impreza, the production line will also be > based on the Impreza. Front mounted intercoolers are available from the > aftermarket, but redesigning the production lines for this, when a > top-mounted intercooler does the job just as well with the car in stock > configuration, is just plain bad business. Also, with the Aero based on the > Impreza, Saab is aiming for a market segment which is easily seduced by > scoops, wings, and so on. Those who don't want a scoop can buy a FMIC kit > and fit a Linear hood. > Thanks for pointing out the implications of the horizontally opposed engine. I knew in the back of my mind that the Subaru had a horizontally opposed engine, but wasn't able to follow through with any conclusions on layout restrictions. It makes sense that since the 9-2X is a Subaru & GM is quite intent on not putting any effort into making it substantially different, that they wouldn't have changed engine bay layout to accommodate the lower-profile (no scoop!) appearance that probably would have appealed more to current Saab owners. I had assumed that the target audience that you mention was the main factor for putting the scoop at the top. I find it hard to imagine that the 9-2X will really get that audience ... won't those kids buy the cheaper WRX sedan (or any of the numerous competitors)? I just don't see the refined interior being a big selling point. Seems like Saab already had a car that targeted that audience in the 9-3 Viggen hatchback. Hans
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
