Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2004 23:04:13 GMT
From: Shane Almeida <almeida.spam.is.evilnospam.is.evil.mindless.com>
Subject: Re: 9-3 2003-2005 Safety Rating - Double Pick


On Fri, 17 Dec 2004 17:36:27 -0500, ma_twain wrote: > I don't find it unlikely. Do you really think the accountants in the GM > headquarters and GM executives get out and prowl around the design labs > of every factory? Once the 9-3 was built and crash tested, it was too > late amd too expensive to "roll back" the change. The only thing the GM > execs could do was make an example of the Saab engineers who pulled a > fast one on them. I'm assuming that changing a chassis on a car that's already been designed is not easy to do. Isn't the point of a common chassis reduced R&D and production costs? It seems like that would be an undertaking that wouldn't go unnoticed. Wouldn't you have to modify the assembly line to produce a different product? Unless I'm overestimating the work involved in changing the design, I can't imagine those kinds of changes going unnoticed. Maybe the changes they made were small but important?

Return to Main Index

The content on this site may not be republished without permission. Copyright © 1988-2019 - The Saab Network - saabnet.com.
For usage guidelines, see the Saabnet.com Mission and Purpose Page.
[Contact | Site Map | Saabnet.com on Facebook | Saabnet.com on Twitter | Shop Amazon via TSN | Site Donations]