Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2005 20:20:55 GMT From: "J. Harris" <jackharrisnospamct-o-cutor.comdamnspam> Subject: Re: 9-3 vs. 900?
Hi Laura, I own both models. FWIW, I swear the 97 900SE Talladega has a tighter/stiffer suspension. If you have the tech specs on the '97 900SE (or an '01 9-3SE), I'd love to see them for comparisons sake. As for the $2k pricing difference, www.kbb.com should tell you if the pricing is "inline" with your market. Separately, $2k could buy a nice new set of tires and dampers/springs and lunch too... And though often maligned, the NG900/9-3 models do offer good "luxury" value, an ample hatch area, and a great turbo engine. Good luck with your hunt. Oh and if you find an immaculate '87/'88 9000T for sale in the USA Southeast, please post its info :o) -- J.Harris '01 9-3SE '97 900SE '88 9000T (R.I.P.) "laurak" <lkrznospamcom> wrote in message news:1105555767.574504.126730nospam2000cwz.googlegroups.com... > I'm trying to replace my 1995 9000 that got run into and have just > about given up on finding a decent 9000 I can afford or that I feel is > worth the money they're asking for it. > Tomorrow I'm looking at a 900 and a 9-3. Both SE. 900 is a 1997 with > close to 100,000 miles. 9-3 is a 1999 with 75,000 miles. Both are > manual. > A lot, of course, will depend on how each one checks out "in person" > but aside from that, is there anything else to consider when looking at > one over the other? The 9-3 is $2,000US more than the 900.
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
