Date: Wed, 4 May 2005 13:58:35 +0100
From: Sleeker GT Phwoar <carl.robsonnospamcing-czechs.com>
Subject: Re: Why is this newsgroup all technical troubleshooting?


In article <42779bdb$0$2064$db0fefd9nospam.zen.co.uk>, grunffnospam.com says... > > I take that to mean that they no longer consider Saabs to be a quality > > car, just an Astra/Vectra with a Saab badge, some different styling and > > interior. > > But this is fairly accurate - why would they consider things differently? > It isn't how accurate it is I'm complaining about, it is what they are openly happy to be smug about doing. Oh the memeber in question isn't an old Jallopy jockey like me, he has a 900, a 9000 and a 9-5 estate (that's how he was contacted intitially because of the annual care survey). You can still build a quality car on a more mundane platform. Look at the 9000 Aero compared to other marques on that platform, only the Alfa 164 V6 came close, but apart from sounding stunning, isn't a patch on the 9000. The 9000 was a Mercedes class car, as was the C900, NG900, C9-3 but 9-5 and the NG 9-3 aren't even up there with Rover I'm afraid (I'm someone who can remember Rover being spoken of in the same sentence as Jaguar, Daimler, Mercedes and look what happened to Rover when the class had gone). -- "Sorry Sir, the meatballs are Orf" The poster formerly known as Skodapilot. http://www.bouncing-czechs.com

Return to Main Index

The content on this site may not be republished without permission. Copyright © 1988-2019 - The Saab Network - saabnet.com.
For usage guidelines, see the Saabnet.com Mission and Purpose Page.
[Contact | Site Map | Saabnet.com on Facebook | Saabnet.com on Twitter | Shop Amazon via TSN | Site Donations]