Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2005 06:31:34 +0100 From: Sleeker GT Phwoar <carl.robsonnospamcing-czechs.com> Subject: Re: Maintain Your Identity - Saab
In article <tEDue.47291$Vj3.32415nospamnews.blueyonder.co.uk>, alistairdorenospamo.com says... > We own a NG900 too, and I've said it before and > I'll say it again, it has been a superb car, reliable, tough, comfortable, > safe and actually a bit of a head turner with my clients. > OK, for someone contemplating returning to Saab ownership, having owned an early square front C900 T16S (yes it really was a 1984 T16S), unless an exceptional Carlsson, Ruby or T16S convertable is willed to me, the tinkering is something I could do without for now (maybe, I have said that before). I also drove a 9000 CDE LPT for a couple of weeks. I liked it. Was thinking of an NG900, but can't get away from the Cavalier tag. WHat are they really like to drive and live with compared to a C900? Which model in the NG900 range was the sporty one? Don't think I would want a NG900 convertable. They don't have the presence of the C900 convert on the road, even though they look nice enough. Or would I be better hunting down a 9000 Aero, or CS Carlsson. Probably won't be for another year unless something stupid happens, as the Celica has just gained itself another years MOT, and there are some bits I've bought that I could do with fitting (decat, braided brake lines, manual boost controller), and some bodywork scrapes, dings (carpark stuff) and laquer flaking, that I would want to sort before trying to move it on. I do really miss my C900, even though the Celica has a sportier driving position, and more power. -- Carl Robson "Sorry Sir the meatballs are orf" (The poster formerly known as Skodapilot) http://www.bouncing-czechs.com
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
