The banner above is an advertisment - if it asks you to download software, please ignore.
Site News - 3/26 M Car Covers (by State of Nine) | 12/12 Make Amazon Pay Saabnet!
Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 16:10:51 GMT
From: Saab Guy <nothingnospamo.com>
Subject: Re: Saab 9-6x photo (SUV should be part "Utility")


On Thu, 28 Jul 2005 15:49:49 GMT Johannes <johsnospam-never-gets-through-sizefitter.com> wrote: > > > Malt_Hound wrote: > > > > Pooh Bear wrote: > > > Shane Almeida wrote: > > > > > > > > >>On Wed, 27 Jul 2005 23:56:35 +0100, Pooh Bear wrote: > > >> > > >>>They are typically considered as 'executive cars' though. Heck, there's > > >>>enough toys in them ! > > >> > > >>And luxury SUVs are the new executive car. > > > > > > > > > I'll pass on that one. I have *no* desire to own an SUV. Never mind the fact > > > it doesn't appeal, I'd be embarassed to own one. > > > > > > Graham > > > > > > > > > > Really? Would you also be embarrassed to own a 19 foot powerboat too? > > How then would propose that one would trailer said boat to the water? > > Surely not with your SAAB, turbo charged or otherwise. > > > > I just got back from 2 weeks vacationing at a beautiful lakeside > > cottage. I hauled 4 people, their luggage, 2 retrievers and my > > powerboat 250 miles each way with one vehicle. It was one of those > > damned SUVs! *gasp* A V8 Ford Exploder no less! > > > > SUVs are just vehicles. They have a purpose, it is just not for > > transporting humans around. For that there are much better instruments. > > True, but the point made was that SUV is now THE car to have for the > middle classes. That has nothing to do with off-road driving or pulling > boats. > > I don't understand it either, maybe I'm too old. It may just be that the > SUV is seen as more substantial. It's probably more difficult to damage > by trivial collisions, but my Saab 9000 has proven very tough in this > respect. An SUV should be part "Utility" and Off-Road. Before the term SUV was created, people called the vehicles ORVs, "Off Road Vehicles", so I guess SUV is correct, because "Sport Utility Vehicle" NEVER SEES ANYTHING BUT PRISTINE PAVEMENT. Here are some examples of what a real SUV should look like. http://www.truckworld.com/Travel-Adventure/98-cameltrophy/training/colo1.jpg http://www.k2news.com/dimages/Camel.jpg By the way, does Land Rover still do Camel Trophy today? SaabGuy

Return to Main Index
StateOfNine.com
SaabClub.com
Jak Stoll Performance
M Car Covers
Ad Available

The content on this site may not be republished without permission. Copyright © 1988-2024 - The Saab Network - saabnet.com.
For usage guidelines, see the Mission & Privacy Notice.
[Contact | Site Map | Saabnet.com on Facebook | Saabnet.com on Twitter | Shop Amazon via TSN | Site Donations]