Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2005 06:04:14 -0400 From: Brian Collins <briannospaminsnet.com> Subject: Re: Newbie
Grunff wrote: > Brian Collins wrote: > > Hi Brian, > >> - What years are considered "classic 900"? > > > 1979-1993 > > >> - What advantages if any exist in the other years outside the >> "classic" range > > > I'll pass on that one - I have very few good things to say about NG900s > (New Generation, 1994-1997). > > >> - any big bad problems noted with the 1997 model? (I have a lead on >> one for sale) > > > Well, they're better than the 1994 models ;-) These cars are totally > different from your 1985 C900 - they are based on a GM platform, and are > considered by many to be the worst cars Saab has ever produced. But some > people like them. > > >> - Auto transmission good/bad reliability? > > > In NG900s? Not bad. > > >> - Any place I can get answers to things like this without pestering >> folks here? > > > There are lots of sites with Saab info out there. If you're looking for > straightforward model data, then: > <http://www.saabmuseum.com/> > > Thank you!
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
