Date: Tue, 04 Oct 2005 23:04:43 GMT From: "Molly B Denum" <mollyb3543nospamcom> Subject: Re: SID - again
"Dan" <dannospamam.com> wrote in message news:suw0f.7$nq1.282nospam.uswest.net... > On 10/4/2005 6:18 AM, Malt_Hound > wrote: >> Molly B Denum wrote: >> >>> >>> One more thing that irks me about Saabs: the radio and speakers in my >>> 2002 9-5 sound horrible and I think that Saab is screwing all those of >>> us who don't like the crappy sound of this radio by monopolizing our >>> freedom of choice and making it near impossible for us to replace this >>> piece of shit with a decent head unit. Whose stupid idea was it to >>> "marry" the radio to the car? Isn't this sort of a shotgun wedding? Just >>> plain stupid >>> >> >> Yeah, that's what I consider most important about my cars. How good the >> sound system is and how easy it will be to upgrade it. >> > > Great sound in a car in an oxymoron. Maybe acceptable is the best to > shoot for. My mom's 200 9-5 sound system is acceptable, my 2004 9-3 is. > When I want hifi I sit on my sofa in an equilateral triangle with my > stereo speakes. You are undoubtebly must be one of those squares who have never heard, and probably never will hear a good hifi sound in an automobile. Sad. It's OK, though, someone needs to occupy the sofa in an equilateral setting. In the meantime, I'll figure out how to replace the piece of shit radio and speakers in my $30,000 Saab/GM automobile. I've already done so in my 96 900S and boy, let me tell you, it sounds great! All I need now in that 900S is an equilateral sofa and a hot tub.