Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2005 07:57:33 +0000 (UTC) From: Craig's Saab C900 Site <c900nospam.apana.org.au> Subject: Re: What a fnospamg scam - FuelSaver my ass - it's just a damn magnet
Bernd Felsche <bernienospamvative.iinet.net.au> writes: >It appears to be the case for many. I very much doubt that the Merc >V12 wouldn't. >My 1990 VW uses 10% less PULP/98 than ULP. Minimum RON 91; according >to the manual and sticker inside the fuel filler flap. >The manual for the 2005 Golf say that a lower RON fuel (than 95) can >be used but will result in reduced performance and increased fuel >consumption. >>Some ppl claim to get better mpg from 95 RON fuel. >Not in this country. I find that my 8V (non-turbo) Saab 900 engine gives better fuel-economy running on something like Optimax which is a nominal 98 RON fuel. The engine was originally specified to run on LRP which has a rating of 97. It runs fine on normal ULP (92 RON) but uses a lot of it. Craig. -- Craig's Saab C900 Page --> http://nospam/~c900 Sydney, NSW Australia Craig's Classic Saab Workshop -- For Saab 99/C900/9000 Enthusiasts world-wide! http://www.nospam.net http://www.nospam c900nospam.apana.org.au Come and explore our site, and check out our web-forums, mailing list, etc.