Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2005 05:43:26 +0000 From: Pooh Bear <rabbitsfriendsandrelationsnospamail.com> Subject: Re: airbag for 93 9000CSET
seog wrote: > "Malt_Hound" <""Malt_Hound\"nospamm-me not*yahoo.com"> wrote in message > > > Incorrect theory. Airbags are only useful when used in conjunction with a > > primary restraint system (read seatbelt). An airbag by itself is > > practically useless. > > > > But I have a better and irrefutable one. If one never gets in collisions > > (note that I did not use the term accident, since it seldom is one) they > > need neither a seatbelt nor an airbag. > > > > I have another theory. People who drive and think they'll never get in an > accident (sorry, collision) and eat greaseburgers everyday and think they > won't get a heart attack and smoke and think they won't get cancer are in > denial. In recent years I have twice been reversed into ! Try and dodge that one ! Graham
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
