Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2005 03:00:06 GMT
From: "seog" <nonospam.com>
Subject: Re: airbag for 93 9000CSET


"Malt_Hound" <""Malt_Hound\"nospamm-me not*yahoo.com"> wrote in message > > Incorrect theory. Airbags are only useful when used in conjunction with a > primary restraint system (read seatbelt). An airbag by itself is > practically useless. > > But I have a better and irrefutable one. If one never gets in collisions > (note that I did not use the term accident, since it seldom is one) they > need neither a seatbelt nor an airbag. > I have another theory. People who drive and think they'll never get in an accident (sorry, collision) and eat greaseburgers everyday and think they won't get a heart attack and smoke and think they won't get cancer are in denial. -- It is not our patriotic duty to send children to be butchered & slaughtered & to butcher & slaughter others every time a general or a politician gets a hardon for a war. Rather, it is our patriotic duty to demand the highest burden of proof to justify war.

Return to Main Index

The content on this site may not be republished without permission. Copyright © 1988-2019 - The Saab Network - saabnet.com.
For usage guidelines, see the Saabnet.com Mission and Purpose Page.
[Contact | Site Map | Saabnet.com on Facebook | Saabnet.com on Twitter | Shop Amazon via TSN | Site Donations]