Date: 1 Feb 2006 19:53:05 GMT From: Dave Hinz <DaveHinznospamcop.net> Subject: Re: SaabUSA Biopower survey
On Wed, 01 Feb 2006 19:41:30 GMT, Bob <uctraingnospamanet.com> wrote: > On 1 Feb 2006 12:59:49 GMT, Dave Hinz <DaveHinznospamcop.net> wrote: > >>Maybe you could quote me the part of the report that you think says what >>you're saying, because I've read the parts I think you refer to several >>times and they seem not to back up your claims. > > Read the report. Don't miss the footnotes. I'm not your librarian. I have. You made a claim that doesn't seem to be backed up by the report. I'm asking what part of the report you think backs up your claim. Seems to me the burdon of proof is on the person making the original claim, not on the person challenging it. >>Severe backpedal noted. > It isn't a backpedel. It was a typo. That's clear if you read the > report (above) and my intention is clear since my statement is based > on the report. If you say so. >>> I don't see any difference and I am not changing points. >> >>This is tiresome. > > Whatever. >>THEY DON'T SET THE PRICES. > > No, not at all. I hear pump prices are controlled by Elvis. The oil companies don't set oil prices, any more than the place you buy gold or silver or any other commodity from, sets _those_ prices. The market determines the price, not the vendors. It's not a tough concept. >>See what I mean? Your type won't even be happy when he does something >>right. > He's a politician. Read between the lines. Go look at the Energy Bill > and tell me how it splits *my* money between oil companies and > alternative energy. I'm not your librarian. Do your own homework. >>So what part of "develop the biofuels infrastructure within the US so we >>can give less money to Arabic countries" do you disagree with, >>specifically, Bob? Can you answer that without more distortions, >>deceptions, and bias? > I can, but I won't. I have no need to engage in a long winded argument > over this. I have a life, it's full of pretty women, and I'd rather > spend my time emailing one of them that arguing with you about > reality. That's fine - enjoy your private reality. Good luck when it happens to intersect with the one the rest of us are in.
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
