Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2006 04:58:36 GMT From: Bob <uctraingnospamanet.com> Subject: Re: SaabUSA Biopower survey
On 31 Jan 2006 18:14:28 GMT, Dave Hinz <DaveHinznospamcop.net> wrote: >On Tue, 31 Jan 2006 17:30:10 GMT, Bob <uctraingnospamanet.com> wrote: >> On 30 Jan 2006 18:41:41 GMT, Dave Hinz <DaveHinznospamcop.net> wrote: >> >>>Please show me a credible cite showing that "we let all the Bin Ladins >>>fly home...". Hint: you can't. Didn't happen. > >> How about the 9-11 commission as a credible cite? > >That's a great idea. You should read it before citing it when it >contradicts your points, though. It confirms exactly what I said - that the Saudi's were quietly allowed to exit the country after light FBI interviews. I'm not sure why you say it contradicts what I said. Go back and read my post. However, I do concede to a typo in my first post where I said "fly home before they got their ass kicked on 9-11" What I should have said was "fly home before they got their ass kicked after 9-11". Obviously they did not fly on 9-11 and I don't know of anyone who has alleged that. There are those that have alleged that they flew out before flights out were allowed and I haven't seen any evidence of that. I have seen that they were given some nice personal treatment by the head of the NSC (and that BS about the Pres and Vice Pres not being aware of what the head of the NSC head was doing is nonsense). That personal treatment certainly made them happy as I suggested in my original post. >I think you should get the facts of what didn't happen before deciding >why it happened. It was still preferential and custom treatment by the head of the NSC with the knowledge of the President to help them get home fast. Read the report you cited. >You just said the oil companies jack the price. It's right up there a >few lines. Now you're saying "Oh, they don't jack the prices, they're >profiting". If you'd be so kind as to pick a point and stay with it, >that'd be wonderful. I don't see any difference and I am not changing points. They are buying and selling oil and making record profits. We are getting screwed at the pump. Call it jacking, call it profiteering, it's the same thing in my book. >It's obvious you don't like anything to do with the oil industry. >That's fine, that's your choice. But it sounds like your decisions are >at least somewhat based on completely wrong information in some cases, >and outright ignorance in others. If you buy the political posturing by Bush concerning alternate fuels, so be it. Wanna buy a bridge ?
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
