Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2006 16:46:13 GMT From: Paul Halliday <pjghnospamyonder.co.uk> Subject: Re: UK Saabers only
in article 44291B2D.83A32E4Anospam-spam-sizefitter.com, Johannes at johsnospam-spam-sizefitter.com wrote on 27/03/2006 12:06: > > > Grunff wrote: >> >> Colum Mylod wrote: >> >>> The principle is not so bad >> >> Oh, it really, really is. >> >> Why the f#£& should I /have/ to pay to fund the BBC even if I don't wish >> to watch any of its channels? > > Not only that, but the license is almost considered as an compulsory Tax. > If you deny that you have a TV, then the licensing authorities will assume > that you're cheating; they will sent out threatening letters of legal > action and come round to inspect your home. For which you can refuse to allow them in ... Go to court ... Have your day out and when asked "How do you plead?", say, "I don't have a TV". Simple as that. Keep wasting their time ... The worst that can happen if you don't have a TV is that you will be inconvenienced with a trip to court once and then the ability to ignore whatever letters come thereafter. Paul 1989 900 Turbo S http://saab.go.dyndns.org/
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
