Date: Sat, 19 Aug 2006 09:36:28 +0100 From: mickx <xnospams.karoo.co.uk> Subject: Re: 2006 9-3 Convt vs 2003
Well when I bought my new Aero conv and posed the GM Question the response I got was............ "It is like giving material to a Saville Row tailor and a tailor for George Asda. Although the material is the same the outcome is very different" In addition, I believe GM have also left the Saab guys pretty much alone, to do there thing - so the calls of "It's a Vectra mate" holds little truth, but the little truth it does hold I can live with. Thoughts anyone........... On Fri, 18 Aug 2006 23:28:37 -0400, Dr. Richard A. Silberstein wrote: > I recently purchased a 2003 9-3se Convt from a relative who left for Japan. > Love everything but harsh ride...and was told newer ones are better riding. > > Am considering getting a "leftover" 2006 (new) but mechanic at SAAB dealer > said that the 2006's were not made as well as the 2003---The 2003 was a true > Swedish-built car, while the 2006 is basically a GM car assembled over > there? > > Would love some opinions about this as I am very reluctant to trade my 2003, > which is totally trouble free, for a possible problem. > THANKS ALL!
