Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 07:43:35 +1200 From: Richard Sutherland-Smith <richard.ssnospamr.net.nz> Subject: Re: 9000 CS vs. Aero...what's the difference?
In message <1154977143.000640.237610nospam2000cwa.googlegroups.com> "Nasty Bob" <speedypancakenospamail.com> wrote: > Jon - sounds like you know your way round a car better than me :) > > >> > > Should I shoot for the automatic Aero? >> > NO! > >> Why?! Except for the fact that it's an automatic... Remember, the car >> with all the issues is a black, 5-speed CS. The Aero was one I found >> previously, from a dealer who isn't very interested in returning phone >> calls. > > Just personal opinion. I understand that autos are more common over > there, but the performance available from a stock Aero is exceptional & > I just feel you need a stick shift to get the most out of it. > > Whatever you decide to do - good luck and I hope you find your car :) > Autos only had 200bhp compared to the manual's 225! -- Richard Sutherland-Smith 19 Webb Road, Wanganui 4500 New Zealand
