Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 18:27:49 -0000 From: Elder <carl.robsonnospamcing-czechs.com> Subject: Re: Lifetime of Saab
In article <456347e2$0$18058$fa0fcedbnospam.zen.co.uk>, thedervmannospaml.com says... >"Elder" <carl.robsonnospamcing-czechs.com> wrote in message >news:MPG.1fccf327b2752f63c47nospam.individual.net... >> In article <ejqhdg$gr7$2nospamoron.nerim.net>, farrisnospam.org says... >>>Why should I not "lump everyone's design together" when that's exactly >>>what GM >>>(the manufacturer of SAAB) has been doing since 1994? >>> >> Because this car does not belong in the post 94 GM world of one lump >> fits all. > > >The later the Saab, the more generic - but that's not to say there are not >still different and unique features in '94 onwards Saabs. > > Oh true. Very true. Infact, one of the possible options to replae the octie come change time is a GM Saab, although I might be tempted by a late 9000 2.3 FPT. -- Carl Robson Audio stream: http://www.bouncing-czechs.com:8000/samtest Homepage: http://www.bouncing-czechs.com Now Playing at home:Switchblade Symphony-Gutter Glitter
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
