Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 20:35:45 GMT From: still me <wheeledBobnospamo.com> Subject: Re: Octane ratings.....what's the truth?
On 20 Apr 2007 02:44:14 GMT, Dave Hinz <DaveHinznospaml.com> wrote: >I was hoping for unbiased sources. Obviously you are incapable of >providing same. Wrong conclusion. Once again, I invite you to do your own research. >At least you're nearing self-awareness. Let me guess - I've plonked you >before and you've nym-shifted yet again, right? Aside from the fact that "plonking" is a habit of the truly lame, you're even lamer - because you claim to plonk people and never do. >> Let me repeat: what happened in the 70's is irrelevant. What is today, >> is. > >Riiiiight. So. One last try there sparky. Why should I believe this >batch of idiots more than the batch of idiots 20 years ago? They both >seem to have the same basic ideas, but with opposite results. What's >the real deal, and why? Hint: if you respond with abuse, that weakens >your credibility. Just so you know. Let me try one more time: what people said 20 years ago has no bearing on the scientific realities today. Continually claiming that it does really makes you look very foolish.
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
