Date: Fri, 18 May 2007 02:58:37 GMT From: still me <wheeledBobnospamo.com> Subject: Re: Saab Lost a Loyal Customer
On Wed, 16 May 2007 20:09:27 GMT, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelationsnospamail.com> wrote: > >In the Uk you could probably sue them in court for supplying 'goods not fit for >the purpose'. You'd need an supporting engineer's report to establish it wasn't >abuse but I'm sure you'd win. So sure, it's unlikely it would ever come to court >here. > >Graham Everything here does carry an "implied warranty of merchantability" meaning that if you buy a car, it should be expected to perform the job. Whether or not you could wrangle this repair to establish that it did not meet the warranty... I don't know. It's not common to see that tact used here. If a lot of cars fail in the same way, then a lawyer will start a class action suit and eventually the company will settle out of court. Gm has always had a "deny everything" policy. Looks like it's finally being applied at Saab.
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
