Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2007 11:36:16 +0100
From: "DervMan" <thedervmannospaml.com>
Subject: Re: Have Saab reintroduced hatchback yet?


"Eeyore" <rabbitsfriendsandrelationsnospamail.com> wrote in message news:46F3F6D7.26E6F76Anospamail.com... > > > Adrian wrote: > >> Colin Stamp (col.dustbinnospamp.plus.com) gurgled happily, sounding much >> like they were saying : >> >> > Yep. Looks are the only real reason I can think of why anyone might >> > actually prefer a saloon to the equivalent hatch. They really don't >> > have any redeeming features to offset the loss in practicality unless >> > you prefer the looks big-time. >> >> Shell rigidity, too. You've got a much smaller hole in the shell. Not >> quite >> relevant to the buying decision for a new car, though. > > I suspect a hatch is more rigid because of where the C pillars are > actually. You are wrong. > They brace the entire rear of the car. No they don't. A hatchback has a great big opening at the back. Saloons don't. The weaker chassis stiffness of a hatchback can be designed out of the machine over a given generation - so a mark three Mondeo hatchback is going to be stiffer than a mark one / two Mondeo saloon, but the hatchback is usually not as stiff as the saloon. -- The DervMan www.dervman.com

Return to Main Index

The content on this site may not be republished without permission. Copyright © 1988-2019 - The Saab Network - saabnet.com.
For usage guidelines, see the Saabnet.com Mission and Purpose Page.
[Contact | Site Map | Saabnet.com on Facebook | Saabnet.com on Twitter | Shop Amazon via TSN | Site Donations]