Re: it's certainly a valid resource - Saabnet.com Bulletin Board
Actually, I can. And do.
It's a completely subjective survey that exists in a vacuum, irrespective of other data that is demonstrably related to its results. You can't take two unrelated products sold to different buyers under different circumstances and then try and correlate post-sales satisfaction. You learn nothing.
Lists like these are the automotive equivalent of asking someone who just ate burger at a fast food joint and someone who just finished a five course meal how satisfied they are with their purchases. Well, I guess they can both answer that question, but the answer has no bearing whatsoever with the quality of the product or even the suitability of the product to task. If you were to switch the respondents, do you think the answers would remain the same? People buying different products have different backgrounds, different means, and different expectations. You can't derive anything quantitative from "satisfaction."
In this particular "study," the proof is in the pudding. People who bought the 200 cite remorse due to poor ride quality. Well, poor ride quality in the 200 is extremely well documented by the motoring press, so why did these people buy a car they were likely to be unsatisfied with and then complain about it? How did they not notice the issues in the test drives? Other cars, like Kias, have poor ride quality, but they didn't make the list.
Like the guy who loved his Big Mac, chances are people going in for the less expensive Hyundai expected some compromises, and people who went in for the Chrysler ignored the warnings and charged in anyway. The study says *far* more about the buyers than the product, and that's the problem with lists like these.
If I bought a 200, it'd be for its value. I've rented one. I know it has a poor ride compared to other vehicles in the segment. If I *still* bought one, I wouldn't complain. Would that make it a good car?
You're welcome to derive value from these lists and that's cool. But, yeah, I can readily and defensibly reject them. :)
posted by 69.62.25...
Posts in this Thread:
- Buyer's Remorse - CR top 10, 2 Acura, 0 Buicks, cheaptech , Sun, 4 Mar 2018 07:22:04
- Re: Buyer's Remorse - CR top 10, 2 Acura, 0 Buicks, Justin VanAbrahams, Mon, 5 Mar 2018 12:51:35
- it's certainly a valid resource, AeroEd , Tue, 6 Mar 2018 16:45:43
- Re: Buyer's Remorse - CR top 10, 2 Acura, 0 Buicks, DE, Mon, 5 Mar 2018 15:43:14
- Re: Buyer's Remorse - CR top 10, 2 Acura, 0 Buicks, cheaptech , Mon, 5 Mar 2018 15:37:07
- Strong February for Regal, A1-turbo, Mon, 5 Mar 2018 05:42:17
- Re: Buyer's Remorse - CR top 10, 2 Acura, 0 Buicks, Norm9-5, Sun, 4 Mar 2018 18:26:35
Post a Followup
No Site Registration is Required to Post - Site Membership is optional (Member Features List), but helps to keep the site online
for all Saabers. If the site helps you, please consider helping the site by becoming a member.
This is a moderated bulletin board - Posting is a privilege, not a right.
Unsolicited commercial postings are not allowed (no Spam). Please, no For Sale or Wanted postings, SERIOUSLY.
Classifieds are to be listed in The Saab Network Classifieds pages.
This is a problem solving forum for over 250,000 Saab owners, so expect to see
problems discussed here even though our cars are generally very reliable. This is not an anything goes
type of forum. Saabnet.com has been a moderated forum since 1988. For usage guidelines, see the
Saabnet.com Mission and Purpose Page. Please remember that you are
not anonymous. Site Contact | Site Donations | Other Sites by SP -
Your address is: 188.8.131.52 - Using CCBot/2.0 (http://commoncrawl.org/faq/) - Logged.
Site Members do not see red text instructions, skyscraper, nor box ads.
Click here to see all
the Site Membership Benefits!