[Subscribe to Daily Digest] |
[Main Performance Bulletin Board | BBFAQ |
Next by Date | Post Followup ]
Member Login / Signup - Members see fewer ads. - Latest Member Gallery Photos
Re: Vapor Engine can get 100MPG+ thoughts? Posted by TML [Email] (#2212) [Profile/Gallery] (more from TML) on Mon, 5 Dec 2011 05:48:14 In Reply to: Re: Vapor Engine can get 100MPG+ thoughts?, Simon S, Fri, 2 Dec 2011 18:06:05 Members do not see ads below this line. - Help Keep This Site Online - Signup |
I don't know much about diesel, for example how energy per volume compares to gasoline, but I think the efficiency difference is in the ball park of 20%, which is not exactly earth shaking. I guess we'd have to look at the actual temperature drop that could be obtained using this magic "humidity carb" in order to say whether it's significant to the total power input. I still maintain that if presence of water in the combustion chamber could significantly improve fuel economy, people would be using it for such, at least in the aftermarket where water injection systems are commonly available, easy to install, and cheap. I have one on my car, and there is no noticeable benefit on fuel economy. Likewise with the turbo, the only "improvement" in fuel economy in my turbo 4 is when you compare to a car of similar power output, like a V6. Compared to a car of the same weight and engine displacement, there is no difference in fuel economy. Whatever heat energy is recovered at the turbo is generally offset by increased heat in the engine itself as the turbo forces it to produce more power.
posted by 24.246.55...
No Site Registration is Required to Post - Site Membership is optional (Member Features List), but helps to keep the site online
for all Saabers. If the site helps you, please consider helping the site by becoming a member.