Date: Mon, 11 May 1998 16:27:57 GMT From: sfoynopsamhealthplan.com Subject: Re: Looking at the 9-5
> > In article <3554D82B.18ADF40Cnopsam.pipex.com>, Tom Lloyd > <t.lloydgsdeenopsam.pipex.com> wrote: > > > Smashing car to drive - suspension much improved over 9000 model. > > Regards > > Tom Lloyd > > > We have a '96 9000 CS and have no complaints about the suspension. > We took a 9-5 out for a test drive. I found the suspension softer > with more body roll. Is this the improvement you talk about? > > /Bob It amazes me how many 9000 owners do not want to accept the reality that the new 9-5 is a much nicer car than their 9000. The 9000 has a primitive rear suspension (same design found on many minivans!), rides harshly, and handles poorly on rough roads. Maybe they are trying to protect the resale value of their 9000's by insisting that the 9-5 is no better (or even worse!) than their 9000. Steve -----== Posted via Deja News, The Leader in Internet Discussion ==----- http://www.dejanews.com/ Now offering spam-free web-based newsreading
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
