Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2002 17:50:25 +0000 From: Paul Halliday <pjghnopsamyonder.co.uk> Subject: Re: GM 900 Vs. Classic 900
in article at9s96$7bg$1nopsam8.svr.pol.co.uk, GG at dt97gdonopsamamhotmail.com wrote on 12/12/2002 11:35: > Just to throw the cat among the pigeons..... > which is the better car the GM 900 or the classic 900, how different are > these two the GM version looks like a saab but is it really a saab? > At present it seems possible to buy a fairly decent version of either for > around £1500 in the UK, which is a better buy? Erm ... The classic is the better car. Why? The key is in the right place and the bonnet opens the right way :) > Also..... > I've got a 1990 900i and I have to say, I love it! Hoping to get a classic > T16s/aero soon how will that compare to my trusty 900i on speed, fuel > consumption and maintenance costs? I have a 1985 900i and a 1989 900 turbo 8V. I actually find that I get better fuel consumption from the turbo during my usual weekly driving. We're talking MPG here, rather than cost, since I *always* use super octane in the turbo and regular unleaded in the injection. I get around 25 MPG and 27/28 MPG respectively. Paul 1985 900i 16V 1989 900 Turbo S http://pjgh.go.dyndns.org/saab/index.html
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
