Date: Fri, 11 Sep 1998 19:35:35 GMT From: bakernopsamnet (Tim Baker) Subject: Re: weight to HP ratio for 900 vs 9000
On Fri, 11 Sep 1998 07:18:58 -0700, Justin VanAbrahams <jvanabranopsamnet> wrote: >_ wrote: >> >> re- weight to Horsepower ratio >> >> Does anyone have figures for a 1992 9000 vs 900 normally >> aspirated models? >> >> thanks >> FPAnderson at geocities dot com > > >No, but I can take a pretty good guess... a '92 9000 >should weigh between 3300 and 3500 lbs - probably >right in the middle. A '92 900 should weight somewhere >between 2800 and 3000 lbs, again probably right in >the middle. HP on a NA 9000 will change depending on >whether it's a 2.0l or a 2.3l - I think the 2.0l made >about 128, and the 2.3l about 150, but I may be wrong. >The 2.1l in the 900 made 140hp. For the record, the >turbocharged engines in these cars made 160hp (2.0l) >or 200 (2.3l). > >-Justin In addition to this, there was an optional turbocharged Special Performance Engine that developed 185HP in a 900. I dont know if this option was available for the 9000. Tim.
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
